When can two offenses be considered part of a common scheme or plan?

Two offenses can be considered part of a common scheme or plan when they are similar or repeated offenses connected by transactions. This means that the offenses share a common goal or method, indicating that they are not isolated incidents but rather part of a larger pattern of criminal behavior. The connection between the offenses can be established through similarities in their execution, target, or the circumstances surrounding them. Such a connection is important in legal contexts as it can influence the severity of charges, sentencing, and the overall understanding of the criminal's behavior.

The focus on the similarity or repetition of offenses highlights that these elements demonstrate an intentionality or strategic approach to committing crimes. It allows law enforcement and the judicial system to recognize that the actions taken are not random but are instead part of a coordinated effort to engage in criminal activities.

For this reason, the other choices do not encapsulate the broader concept of a common scheme or plan effectively. Specifically, leading to a similar outcome does not necessarily indicate a shared strategy, involving similar types of victims may not be relevant to the commonality of the offenses themselves, and the requirement for the same individual to commit the offenses excludes potential accomplices and larger conspiracies. The essence of identifying a common scheme lies in the interconnectedness and strategic nature of